Monday, December 1, 2008

JUST SAY NO to a FEDERAL CAR CZAR!!

What to look for in a federal 'car czar'? JUST SAY NO
View from: Lauren Fix, The Car Coach® and Car-Ma Coach™

If the proposed auto industry rescue is going to come to fruition, and that should become clear this week as industry executives and union leaders testify before Congress, it makes sense for the government to name a "car czar" to watch over the Detroit Three as they spend $25 billion in taxpayer money.

While not a hands-on executive, this official might become a "super member" of the boards of Ford and GM, with veto power over decisions and the holder of the last word at Chrysler LLC, which is privately owned but also queuing up for public assistance. Ultimately, the appointee should be empowered to determine how the loaned funds are spent -- and to pull the plug if need be should things go from bad to hopeless. Ideally, government would have no occasion to interfere this aggressively in the day-to-day operation of an industry. But we're talking about $25 billion. This is about basic accountability.

The ideal person for the job would be both knowledgeable about the motor vehicle business and savvy about navigating the corridors of political power in Washington.

Some names leap to the fore, such as former Michigan Gov. James Blanchard, who as a congressman was instrumental in securing the 1979 federal loan guarantees that saved Chrysler Corp. Former Sen. Don Riegle was also heavily involved. Both ex-politicians have remained visible in Washington. And speaking of Chrysler, Lee Iacocca just turned 84 but doesn't seem to have slowed down much.

Even if Congress acts on the loans during its lame-duck session, an appointment may fall to President-elect Barack Obama, who takes office Jan. 20 and will not want the auto loans to be squandered on his watch. Since he's a professed believer in bipartisanship, Obama may want to inquire as to the availability of another former Michigan governor, Republican John Engler, now president of the National Association of Manufacturers, which includes the auto companies. Engler would probably have to take a leave of absence to avoid a conflict.

Also on the GOP side is Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, a Michigan native and the son of an auto industry leader. Romney made a fortune as a "turnaround specialist" in business before entering politics. Romney, of course, also could again be a Republican candidate for president in 2012, so Obama may not want to give him this much visibility. On the other hand, if the loans fail to save the industry...

There is surely any number of people qualified for this watchdog role, including some who would relish the opportunity to help reshape the industry for a brighter future. The main point is that, rather than making this one part of somebody's responsibility, overseeing the best use of $25 billion by an industry desperate for cash ought to be somebody's full-time job. Then the president -- and the financiers -- would know who is accountable.


Federal Loans to Automakers Could Come with 'Car Czar' Oversight

Sourced From: Detroit News, November 13, 2008

Situation
1. President-elect Barack Obama considering appointing an "auto czar"
2. Role to oversee emergency federal aid to automakers, exact tough corporate reforms
3. Also ensure taxpayers earn a return on any investment in auto industry
4. Car czar could serve as point person for federal agencies
5. Sen Levin (D-MI) supports Obama naming an auto or manufacturing czar

Significant Points
1. Automakers accepting loans likely would have significant oversight
2. Government could get shares in automakers that could balloon w/ recovery
3. Obama has 3 auto advisers (Furman, Tarullo, Steiner) but none named yet
4. MI Governor Granholm and former Congressman Bonior also advise Obama on auto industry

Background
1. Obama auto advisers include economic adviser Jason Furman, Georgetown University law professor Dan Tarullo, and former Clinton Treasury official Joshua Steiner, The "[Auto Czar] can't be some ideologue or someone with an ax to grind or someone who read about the auto industry in a pamphlet two years ago." -- David Cole, chairman, Center for Automotive Research

AND WHEN was the last time THE GOVERNMENT FULLY DISCLOSED HOW OUR MONEY IS SPENT?
They won't even tell you who gets bailout money, PSSSSSSSSST - IT’S A SECRET. It's starting to look like 1939 GERMANY all over again OR the British auto bailout of the 70's, which ruined a major manufacturer there.

Every time the government controls what we get, we don't get what we want. Could you imagine all American cars being the same boring beige box? No convertibles, no sports cars, no SUVs, no fun sedans. The Big 3 could lose their autonomy and that means fewer choices for us.

If Lauren had her way, the taxpayers wouldn't rescue the Big 3. The money should come from private industry such as the oil companies. They have the money, they've been in the bed with the auto industry for years, and it would certainly shift public perception about them. Furthermore, a low interest loan to the Big 3 from Big Oil would mean our auto companies would keep their autonomy and the oil companies could see a decent profit (something they're used to), especially if they are paid in stock shares.

Automotive Expert Lauren Fix (The Car Coach), award-winning author of three automotive books, ASE certified engineer, host of her own automotive TV show on DIY, race car driver, spokesperson for the Car Care Council, editor-in-chief for CarZen.com, and all-around TV news expert, is available to discuss the following topic all week.

For more info on Lauren, please visit www.laurenfix.com or catch me on twitter:





3 comments:

Mike McCann said...

Are Ford and GM near death in Europe? I don't think so.

Why have they refused to bring the designs that fit the marketplace in the UK, Europe and Latin America -- Ford models such as the Mexican/Brazilian EcoSport (a smaller SUV one size smaller than the Escape), the British Kuga (looks like a Subaru Forester - Toyota RAV-4 fighter) or Fusion Wagon (smart sized, nice looking) or the Ford Focus copue (looks like a fun sports model, a la the Scion Coupe).

http://www.ford.co.uk/ns7/all_cars/-/-/-/-/-/-

Why are these attractive models that fit the reality of today's market not sold here?

How difficult would it be for the tooling that lets Ford them be built halfway around the world be duplicated here?

Or, in GM's case, where is the Vauxhall Meriva -- looks like a rival to the Honda Fit and Nissan Versa, two very strong sellers. How about the Zafira

http://www.vauxhall.com/vaux/vehicle/vehicleBrandAction.do?method=viewBrand&brandCode=9Q

A smart-looking smaller family wagon that holds 7?

These are not pie-in-sky fantasies. These are cars you can go and buy in England right now.

Yet the Big 3 would rather build inefficient, lumbering dogs like the current Taurus or Chrysler 300, the Sebring Sedan or Pontiac G6.

The question has to be -- why have Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Subaru been so savvy and you missed the boat? Or buried your head in the sang like an ostrich.

I've been a fan of the auto industry since the mid 1960s. Somewhere along the line, the companies that gave us the classics of our youth fell out of touch with us; lost focus on our priorities and forgot they had sharp-eyed competitors.

Maybe we need to demand that Ford and GM bring their European leadership to Detroit. And their R&D people as well.

thecarcoach said...

Ford is planning on bringing over some of their smaller cars and even diesel vehicles. It appears as though they are moving to "world-wide platforms". This is a smart move and a big money saver too. Its based on market need and what will sell. I'm sure that Nissan and KIA are doing the same with Versa and the Cube.

I agree that Ford in the UK has some amazing cars. Australian cars are fantastic too.

GM is looking at the same idea - world platforms and bodies will lower costs. Be more flexible and grab more market share.

The reason other manufacturers are making money is because of legacy costs. They have no unions and that saves HUGE money.

As a huge fan of the auto industry as well - i worried that the Federal Government who can't run their own business at all is going to tell the Big 3 how to do it right. Now that's scary!!

The current Big 3 move slow because of unions - which has always held them hostage!

VernettaSabryna said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Alena

www.smallbusinessavenues.com